Thomas Cowan: de Sars-COV-2-fraude

di, 20/10/2020 - 16:42
0 comments
Griep

Griep is in 2020 gewoon verdwenen. Of hebben ze het nu gewoon Covid19 genoemd?

Dit belangrijk artikel van Thomas Cowan over covid-19 (of beter gezegd: Sars-COV-2, het virus dus en niet de "ziekte") verdient een aparte post. Cowan deed immers een onvoorstelbare ontdekking: niet alleen blijkt uit een onderzoek van de CDC dat het virus niet volledig en op fatsoenlijke manier werd geïsoleerd en gepurifieerd...

First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes  This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus.  They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.

To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. 

...maar sterker nog, ze konden niet aantonen dat het virus besmettelijk is voor mensen en dat het de oorzaak zou zijn voor de ziekte COVID19 genaamd:

 When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test.  The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus.  The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus.  Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice.  The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur.  They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.

The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.

The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing  SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested.  In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings.  It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.

My friends, read this again and again.  These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings.  That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.

In mijn ogen betekent dit onderzoek dat het debat over het al dan niet bestaan van Sars-cov-2 voorbij is. Immers, zelfs als men aanneemt dat het virus bestaat, dan nog is er doorslaggevend bewijs dat het niet de oorzaak is van COVID-19. Wat is het dan wel? De meest voor de hand liggende uitleg is dat ze de griep gewoon het label COVID-19 hebben gegeven, wat meteen ook verklaart dat de griep in 2020 gewoon verdwenen is:

griep

Lees meer hierover op de blog van Jon Rapoport.

Tags